Romance clitics almost OK ; bug fix in tb -c

This commit is contained in:
aarne
2006-02-14 20:42:36 +00:00
parent a8d99d9571
commit 87ff64e0fc
19 changed files with 165 additions and 250 deletions

View File

@@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ oper
-- The use of "ne" as atonic genitive is debatable.
-- We follow the rule that the atonic nominative is empty.
mkPronoun : (_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_ : Str) ->
Gender -> Number -> Person -> ClitType -> Pronoun =
\il,le,lui,Lui,son,sa,ses,see,g,n,p,c ->
mkPronoun : (_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_ : Str) ->
Gender -> Number -> Person -> Pronoun =
\il,le,lui,glie,Lui,son,sa,ses,see,g,n,p ->
{s = table {
Ton Nom => il ;
Ton x => prepCase x ++ Lui ;
@@ -142,14 +142,15 @@ oper
Aton Acc => le ;
Aton (CPrep P_di) => "ne" ; --- hmm
Aton (CPrep P_a) => lui ;
Aton q => prepCase q ++ Lui ; ---- GF bug with c or p!
Aton q => prepCase q ++ Lui ; ---- GF bug with c or p!
PreClit => glie ;
Poss {n = Sg ; g = Masc} => son ;
Poss {n = Sg ; g = Fem} => sa ;
Poss {n = Pl ; g = Masc} => ses ;
Poss {n = Pl ; g = Fem} => see
} ;
a = {g = g ; n = n ; p = p} ;
c = c
hasClit = True
} ;
--2 Determiners