moving a few things to deprecated

This commit is contained in:
aarne
2009-12-09 09:47:16 +00:00
parent df019fa427
commit a2546722d1
676 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,400 @@
--# -path=.:../abstract:../common:../../prelude
--1 Russian auxiliary operations.
-- This module contains operations that are needed to make the
-- resource syntax work. To define everything that is needed to
-- implement $Test$, it moreover contains regular lexical
-- patterns needed for $Lex$.
resource ResRus = ParamX ** open Prelude in {
flags coding=utf8 ; optimize=all ;
--2 Enumerated parameter types
--
-- These types are the ones found in school grammars.
-- Their parameter values are atomic.
-- Some parameters, such as $Number$, are inherited from $ParamX$.
param
Gender = Masc | Fem | Neut ;
Case = Nom | Gen | Dat | Acc | Inst | Prepos PrepKind ;
PrepKind = PrepOther | PrepVNa;
Animacy = Animate | Inanimate ;
Voice = Act | Pass ;
Aspect = Imperfective | Perfective ;
RusTense = Present | PastRus | Future ;
-- Degree = Pos | Comp | Super ;
AfterPrep = Yes | No ;
Possessive = NonPoss | Poss GenNum ;
-- Anteriority = Simul | Anter ;
ClForm = ClIndic RusTense Anteriority | ClCondit | ClInfinit | ClImper;
-- "naked infinitive" clauses
-- A number of Russian nouns have common gender. They can
-- denote both males and females: "умница" (a clever person), "инженер" (an engineer).
-- We overlook this phenomenon for now.
-- The AfterPrep parameter is introduced in order to describe
-- the variations of the third person personal pronoun forms
-- depending on whether they come after a preposition or not.
-- Declination forms depend on Case, Animacy , Gender:
-- "большие дома" - "больших домов" (big houses - big houses'),
-- Animacy plays role only in the Accusative case (Masc Sg and Plural forms):
-- Accusative Animate = Genetive, Accusaive Inanimate = Nominative
-- "я люблю большие дома-"я люблю больших мужчин"
-- (I love big houses - I love big men);
-- and on Number: "большой дом - "большие дома"
-- (a big house - big houses).
-- The plural never makes a gender distinction.
GenNum = ASg Gender | APl ;
-- Coercions between the compound gen-num type and gender and number:
oper
gNum : Gender -> Number -> GenNum = \g,n ->
case n of
{ Sg => case g of
{ Fem => ASg Fem ;
Masc => ASg Masc ;
Neut => ASg Neut } ;
Pl => APl
} ;
-- The Possessive parameter is introduced in order to describe
-- the possessives of personal pronouns, which are used in the
-- Genetive constructions like "моя мама" (my mother) instead of
-- "мама моя" (the mother of mine).
--2 For $Noun$
-- Nouns decline according to number and case.
-- For the sake of shorter description these parameters are
-- combined in the type SubstForm.
param
SubstForm = SF Number Case ;
-- Real parameter types (i.e. ones on which words and phrases depend)
-- are mostly hierarchical. The alternative would be cross-products of
-- simple parameters, but this would usually overgenerate.
-- However, we use the cross-products in complex cases
-- (for example, aspect and tense parameter in the verb description)
-- where the relationship between the parameters are non-trivial
-- even though we aware that some combinations do not exist
-- (for example, present perfective does not exist, but removing
-- this combination would lead to having different descriptions
-- for perfective and imperfective verbs, which we do not want for the
-- sake of uniformity).
param PronForm = PF Case AfterPrep Possessive;
oper Pronoun = { s : PronForm => Str ; n : Number ; p : Person ;
g: PronGen ; pron: Bool} ;
-- Gender is not morphologically determined for first
-- and second person pronouns.
param PronGen = PGen Gender | PNoGen ;
-- The following coercion is useful:
oper
pgen2gen : PronGen -> Gender = \p -> case p of {
PGen g => g ;
PNoGen => Masc ---- variants {Masc ; Fem} --- the best we can do for ya, tu
} ;
oper
extCase: PronForm -> Case = \pf -> case pf of { PF c _ _ => c } ;
mkPronForm: Case -> AfterPrep -> Possessive -> PronForm =
\c,n,p -> PF c n p ;
CommNounPhrase: Type = {s : Number => Case => Str; g : Gender; anim : Animacy} ;
NounPhrase : Type = { s : PronForm => Str ; n : Number ;
p : Person ; g: PronGen ; anim : Animacy ; pron: Bool} ;
mkNP : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \n,chelovek ->
{s = \\cas => chelovek.s ! n ! (extCase cas) ;
n = n ; g = PGen chelovek.g ; p = P3 ; pron =False ;
anim = chelovek.anim
} ;
det2NounPhrase : Adjective -> NounPhrase = \eto ->
{s = \\pf => eto.s ! (AF (extCase pf) Inanimate (ASg Neut)); n = Sg ; g = PGen Neut ; pron = False ; p = P3 ; anim = Inanimate } ;
pron2NounPhraseNum : Pronoun -> Animacy -> Number -> NounPhrase = \ona, anim, num ->
{s = ona.s ; n = num ; g = ona.g ;
pron = ona.pron; p = ona.p ; anim = anim } ;
-- Agreement of $NP$ is a record. We'll add $Gender$ later.
-- oper Agr = {n : Number ; p : Person} ;
----2 For $Verb$
-- Mood is the main verb classification parameter.
-- The verb mood can be infinitive, subjunctive, imperative, and indicative.
-- Note: subjunctive mood is analytical, i.e. formed from the past form of the
-- indicative mood plus the particle "ли". That is why they have the same GenNum
-- parameter. We choose to keep the "redundant" form in order to indicate
-- the presence of the subjunctive mood in Russian verbs.
-- Aspect and Voice parameters are present in every mood, so Voice is put
-- before the mood parameter in verb form description the hierachy.
-- Moreover Aspect is regarded as an inherent parameter of a verb entry.
-- The primary reason for that is that one imperfective form can have several
-- perfective forms: "ломать" - "сломать" - "поломать" (to break).
-- Besides, the perfective form could be formed from imperfective
-- by prefixation, but also by taking a completely different stem:
-- "говорить"-"сказать" (to say). In the later case it is even natural to
-- regard them as different verb entries.
-- Another reason is that looking at the Aspect as an inherent verb parameter
-- seem to be customary in other similar projects:
-- http://starling.rinet.ru/morph.htm
-- Note: Of course, the whole inflection table has many redundancies
-- in a sense that many verbs do not have all grammatically possible
-- forms. For example, passive does not exist for the verb
-- "любить" (to love), but exists for the verb "ломаться" (to break).
-- In present tense verbs do not conjugate according to Genus,
-- so parameter GenNum instead Number is used for the sake of
-- using for example as adjective in predication.
-- Depending on the tense verbs conjugate according to combinations
-- of gender, person and number of the verb objects.
-- Participles (Present and PastRus) and Gerund forms are not included in the
-- current description. This is the verb type used in the lexicon:
oper Verbum : Type = { s: VerbForm => Str ; asp : Aspect };
param
VerbForm = VFORM Voice VerbConj ;
VerbConj = VIND GenNum VTense | VIMP Number Person | VINF | VSUB GenNum ;
VTense = VPresent Person | VPast | VFuture Person ;
oper
getVTense : RusTense -> Person -> VTense= \t,p ->
case t of { Present => VPresent p ; PastRus => VPast; Future => VFuture p } ;
getTense : Tense -> RusTense= \t ->
case t of { Pres => Present
; Fut => Future --# notpresent
; _ => PastRus --# notpresent
} ;
getVoice: VerbForm -> Voice = \vf ->
case vf of {
VFORM Act _ => Act;
VFORM Pass _ => Pass
};
oper sebya : Case => Str =table {
Nom => "";
Gen => "себя";
Dat=> "себе";
Acc => "себя";
Inst => "собой";
Prep =>"себе"};
Verb : Type = {s : ClForm => GenNum => Person => Str ; asp : Aspect ; w: Voice} ;
-- Verb phrases are discontinuous: the parts of a verb phrase are
-- (s) an inflected verb, (s2) verb adverbials (not negation though), and
-- (s3) complement. This discontinuity is needed in sentence formation
-- to account for word order variations.
VerbPhrase : Type = Verb ** {s2: Str; s3 : Gender => Number => Str ;
negBefore: Bool} ;
-- This is one instance of Gazdar's *slash categories*, corresponding to his
-- $S/NP$.
-- We cannot have - nor would we want to have - a productive slash-category former.
-- Perhaps a handful more will be needed.
--
-- Notice that the slash category has the same relation to sentences as
-- transitive verbs have to verbs: it's like a *sentence taking a complement*.
SlashNounPhrase = Clause ** Complement ;
Clause = {s : Polarity => ClForm => Str} ;
-- This is the traditional $S -> NP VP$ rule.
predVerbPhrase : NounPhrase -> VerbPhrase -> SlashNounPhrase =
\Ya, tebyaNeVizhu -> { s = \\b,clf =>
let
{ ya = Ya.s ! (mkPronForm Nom No NonPoss);
khorosho = tebyaNeVizhu.s2;
vizhu = tebyaNeVizhu.s ! clf !(gNum (pgen2gen Ya.g) Ya.n)! Ya.p;
tebya = tebyaNeVizhu.s3 ! (pgen2gen Ya.g) ! Ya.n
}
in
ya ++ khorosho ++ vizhu ++ tebya;
s2= "";
c = Nom
} ;
-- Questions are either direct ("Ты счастлив?")
-- or indirect ("Потом он спросил счастлив ли ты").
param
QuestForm = DirQ | IndirQ ;
---- The order of sentence is needed already in $VP$.
--
-- Order = ODir | OQuest ;
oper
getActVerbForm : ClForm -> Gender -> Number -> Person -> VerbForm = \clf,g,n, p -> case clf of
{ ClIndic Future _ => VFORM Act (VIND (gNum g n) (VFuture p));
ClIndic PastRus _ => VFORM Act (VIND (gNum g n) VPast);
ClIndic Present _ => VFORM Act (VIND (gNum g n) (VPresent p));
ClCondit => VFORM Act (VSUB (gNum g n));
ClInfinit => VFORM Act VINF ;
ClImper => VFORM Act (VIMP n p)
};
getPassVerbForm : ClForm -> Gender -> Number -> Person -> VerbForm = \clf,g,n, p -> case clf of
{ ClIndic Future _ => VFORM Pass (VIND (gNum g n) (VFuture p));
ClIndic PastRus _ => VFORM Pass (VIND (gNum g n) VPast);
ClIndic Present _ => VFORM Pass (VIND (gNum g n) (VPresent p));
ClCondit => VFORM Pass (VSUB (gNum g n));
ClInfinit => VFORM Pass VINF ;
ClImper => VFORM Pass (VIMP n p)
};
--2 For $Adjective$
-- The short form is only inflected in gender and number.
-- Fixing this would require changing the Degree type.
param
AdjForm = AF Case Animacy GenNum | AFShort GenNum | AdvF;
oper
Complement = {s2 : Str ; c : Case} ;
oper Refl ={s: Case => Str};
oper sam: Refl=
{s = table{
Nom => "сам";
Gen => "себя";
Dat => "себе";
Acc => "себя";
Inst => "собой";
Prepos _ => "себе"
}
};
pgNum : PronGen -> Number -> GenNum = \g,n ->
case n of
{ Sg => ASg (pgen2gen g) ; -- assuming pronoun "I" is a male
Pl => APl
} ;
-- _ => variants {ASg Masc ; ASg Fem} } ;
-- "variants" version cause "no term variants" error during linearization
oper numGNum : GenNum -> Number = \gn ->
case gn of { APl => Pl ; _ => Sg } ;
oper genGNum : GenNum -> Gender = \gn ->
case gn of { ASg Fem => Fem; ASg Masc => Masc; _ => Neut } ;
oper numAF: AdjForm -> Number = \af ->
case af of { AdvF => Sg; AFShort gn => numGNum gn; AF _ _ gn => (numGNum gn) } ;
oper genAF: AdjForm -> Gender = \af ->
case af of { AdvF => Neut; AFShort gn => genGNum gn; AF _ _ gn => (genGNum gn) } ;
oper caseAF: AdjForm -> Case = \af ->
case af of { AdvF => Nom; AFShort _ => Nom; AF c _ _ => c } ;
-- The Degree parameter should also be more complex, since most Russian
-- adjectives have two comparative forms:
-- attributive (syntactic (compound), declinable) -
-- "более высокий" (corresponds to "more high")
-- and predicative (indeclinable)- "выше" (higher) and more than one
-- superlative forms: "самый высокий" (corresponds to "the most high") -
-- "высочайший" (the highest).
-- Even one more parameter independent of the degree can be added,
-- since Russian adjectives in the positive degree also have two forms:
-- long (attributive and predicative) - "высокий" (high) and short (predicative) - "высок"
-- although this parameter will not be exactly orthogonal to the
-- degree parameter.
-- Short form has no case declension, so in principle
-- it can be considered as an additional case.
-- Note: although the predicative usage of the long
-- form is perfectly grammatical, it can have a slightly different meaning
-- compared to the short form.
-- For example: "он - больной" (long, predicative) vs.
-- "он - болен" (short, predicative).
--3 Adjective phrases
--
-- An adjective phrase may contain a complement, e.g. "моложе Риты".
-- Then it is used as postfix in modification, e.g. "человек, моложе Риты".
IsPostfixAdj = Bool ;
-- Simple adjectives are not postfix:
-- Adjective type includes both non-degree adjective classes:
-- possesive ("мамин"[mother's], "лисий" [fox'es])
-- and relative ("русский" [Russian]) adjectives.
Adjective : Type = {s : AdjForm => Str} ;
-- A special type of adjectives just having positive forms
-- (for semantic reasons) is useful, e.g. "финский".
AdjPhrase = Adjective ** {p : IsPostfixAdj} ;
mkAdjPhrase : Adjective -> IsPostfixAdj -> AdjPhrase = \novuj ,p -> novuj ** {p = p} ;
----2 For $Relative$
--
-- RAgr = RNoAg | RAg {n : Number ; p : Person} ;
-- RCase = RPrep | RC Case ;
--
--2 For $Numeral$
param DForm = unit | teen | ten | hund ;
param Place = attr | indep ;
param Size = nom | sgg | plg ;
--param Gend = masc | fem | neut ;
oper mille : Size => Str = table {
{nom} => "тысяча" ;
{sgg} => "тысячи" ;
_ => "тысяч"} ;
oper gg : Str -> Gender => Str = \s -> table {_ => s} ;
-- CardOrd = NCard | NOrd ;
----2 Transformations between parameter types
--
oper
numSF: SubstForm -> Number = \sf -> case sf of { SF n _ => n } ;
caseSF: SubstForm -> Case = \sf -> case sf of { SF _ c => c } ;
}