Files
gf-core/lib/resource/romance/SyntaxRomance.gf
2005-12-08 07:52:57 +00:00

1429 lines
46 KiB
Plaintext

--1 A Small Romance Resource Syntax
--
-- Aarne Ranta 2002
--
-- This resource grammar contains definitions needed to construct
-- indicative, interrogative, and imperative sentences in Romance languages.
-- We try to share as much as possible. Even if the definitions of certain
-- operations are different in $syntax.Fra.gf$ and $syntax.Ita.gf$, we can
-- often give their type signatures in this file.
--
-- The following files are presupposed:
interface SyntaxRomance = TypesRomance ** open Prelude, (CO=Coordination) in {
--2 Common Nouns
--
-- Common nouns are defined as number-dependent strings with a gender.
-- Complex common noun ($CommNounPhrase$) have the same type as simple ones.
-- (The distinction is made just because of uniformity with other languages.)
oper
CommNoun : Type = {s : Number => Str ; g : Gender} ;
CommNounPhrase = CommNoun ;
noun2CommNounPhrase : CommNounPhrase -> CommNoun = \x -> x ;
commonNounComp : CommNoun -> Str -> CommNoun = \numero, detelephone ->
{s = \\n => numero.s ! n ++ detelephone ;
g = numero.g
} ;
--2 Noun phrase
--
-- The worst case is pronouns, which have inflection in the possessive
-- forms. Other noun phrases express all possessive forms with the genitive case.
-- Proper names are the simples example.
ProperName : Type = {s : Str ; g : Gender} ;
NounPhrase : Type = Pronoun ; -- the worst case
nameNounPhrase : ProperName -> NounPhrase ;
mkProperName : Str -> Gender -> ProperName = \jean,m ->
{s = jean ; g = m} ;
mkNameNounPhrase : Str -> Gender -> NounPhrase = \jean,m ->
nameNounPhrase (mkProperName jean m) ;
nounPhraseOn : NounPhrase ;
normalNounPhrase : (CaseA => Str) -> Gender -> Number -> NounPhrase = \cs,g,n ->
{s = \\p => cs ! (pform2case p) ;
g = PGen g ;
n = n ;
p = P3 ; -- third person
c = Clit0 -- not clitic
} ;
pronNounPhrase : Pronoun -> NounPhrase = \pro -> pro ;
-- Many determiners can be modified with numerals, which may be inflected in
-- gender. The label $isNo$ is a hack used to force $des$ for plural
-- indefinite with $noNum$.
Numeral : Type = {s : Gender => Str ; n : Number ; isNo : Bool} ;
pronWithNum : Pronoun -> Numeral -> Pronoun = \nous,deux ->
{s = \\c => nous.s ! c ++ deux.s ! pgen2gen nous.g ;
g = nous.g ;
n = nous.n ;
p = nous.p ;
c = nous.c
} ;
noNum : Numeral = {s = \\_ => [] ; n = Pl ; isNo = True} ;
-- The existence construction "il y a", "c'è / ci sono" is defined separately,
-- and ad hoc, in each language.
existNounPhrase : NounPhrase -> Clause ;
-- To add a symbol, such as a variable or variable list, to the end of
-- an NP.
addSymbNounPhrase : NounPhrase -> Str -> NounPhrase = \np,x ->
{s = \\c => np.s ! c ++ x ;
g = np.g ;
n = np.n ;
p = np.p ;
c = np.c
} ;
--2 Determiners
--
-- Determiners are inflected according to the gender of the nouns they determine.
-- The determiner determines the number of the argument noun.
Determiner : Type = {s : Gender => Str ; n : Number} ;
DeterminerNum : Type = {s : Gender => Str} ;
detNounPhrase : Determiner -> CommNoun -> NounPhrase = \tout, homme ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => prepCase c ++ tout.s ! homme.g ++ homme.s ! tout.n)
homme.g
tout.n ;
numDetNounPhrase : DeterminerNum -> Numeral -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase =
\tous, six, homme ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => prepCase c ++ tous.s ! homme.g ++ six.s ! homme.g ++ homme.s ! six.n)
homme.g
six.n ;
--- Here one would like to provide a feminine variant as well.
justNumDetNounPhrase : DeterminerNum -> Numeral -> NounPhrase =
\tous, six ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => prepCase c ++ tous.s ! Masc ++ six.s ! Masc)
Masc
six.n ;
-- The following macros are sufficient to define most determiners,
-- as shown by the examples that follow.
mkDeterminer : Number -> Str -> Str -> Determiner = \n,tous,toutes ->
{s = genForms tous toutes ; n = n} ;
mkDeterminer1 : Number -> Str -> Determiner = \n,chaque ->
mkDeterminer n chaque chaque ;
mkDeterminerNum : Str -> Str -> DeterminerNum =
\tous,toutes ->
{s = \\g => genForms tous toutes ! g} ;
-- Indefinite and definite noun phrases are treated separately,
-- since noun phrases formed by them also depend on case.
-- The indefinite case with a numeral has no separate article:
-- "il y a 86 voitures", not "il y a des 86 voitures".
indefNounPhrase : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \n,mec ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => artIndef mec.g n c ++ mec.s ! n)
mec.g
n ;
indefNounPhraseNum : Numeral -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \nu,mec ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => case nu.isNo of {
True => artIndef mec.g Pl c ++ mec.s ! Pl ;
_ => prepCase c ++ nu.s ! mec.g ++ mec.s ! nu.n
}
)
mec.g
nu.n ;
defNounPhrase : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \n,mec ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => artDef mec.g n c ++ mec.s ! n)
mec.g
n ;
defNounPhraseNum : Numeral -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \nu,mec ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => artDef mec.g nu.n c ++ nu.s !mec.g ++ mec.s ! nu.n)
mec.g
nu.n ;
-- We often need indefinite noun phrases synacategorematically.
indefNoun : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> Str = \n,mec ->
(indefNounPhrase n mec).s ! case2pform nominative ;
-- Genitives of noun phrases can be used like determiners, to build noun phrases.
-- The number argument makes the difference between "ma maison" - "mes maisons".
-- The clitic type of the NP decides between "ma maison" and "la maison de Jean".
npGenDet : Number -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase =
\n,jeanne,mec ->
let {str : CaseA => Str = case jeanne.c of {
Clit0 => npGenDe n jeanne mec ;
_ => npGenPoss n jeanne mec
}
} in
normalNounPhrase str mec.g n ;
npGenDetNum : Numeral -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase =
\nu,jeanne,mec ->
let {str : CaseA => Str = case jeanne.c of {
Clit0 => npGenDeNum nu jeanne mec ;
_ => npGenPossNum nu jeanne mec
}
} in
normalNounPhrase str mec.g nu.n ;
-- These auxiliary rules define the genitive with "de" and with the possessive.
-- Here there is a difference between French and Italian: Italian has a definite
-- article before possessives (with certain exceptions).
npGenDe : Number -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> CaseA => Str =
\n,jeanne,mec ->
\\c => artDef mec.g n c ++ mec.s ! n ++ jeanne.s ! case2pform genitive ;
npGenDeNum : Numeral -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> CaseA => Str =
\nu,jeanne,mec ->
\\c => artDef mec.g nu.n c ++ nu.s ! mec.g ++ mec.s ! nu.n ++
jeanne.s ! case2pform genitive ;
npGenPoss : Number -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> CaseA => Str ;
npGenPossNum : Numeral -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> CaseA => Str ;
-- Constructions like "l'idée que la terre est ronde" are formed at the
-- first place as common nouns, so that one can also have "la suggestion que...".
nounThatSentence : CommNounPhrase -> Sentence -> CommNounPhrase = \idee,x ->
{s = \\n => idee.s ! n ++ elisQue ++ x.s ! Ind ;
g = idee.g
} ;
-- The partitive noun phrase has special nominative and accusative, which look like
-- genitives ("du vin, avec du vin", as well as genitive form, where the definite
-- article contracts away ("de vin").
partitiveNounPhrase : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> NounPhrase ;
--2 Adjectives
--
-- Adjectives have a parameter $p$ telling if postposition is
-- allowed (complex APs). There is no real need in Romance languages to distinguish
-- between simple adjectives and adjectival phrases.
Adjective : Type = Adj ** {p : Bool} ;
adjPre = True ; adjPost = False ;
AdjPhrase : Type = Adjective ;
adj2adjPhrase : Adjective -> AdjPhrase = \x -> x ;
mkAdjective : Adj -> Bool -> Adjective = \adj,p -> adj ** {p = p} ;
--3 Comparison adjectives
--
-- The type is defined in $TypesRomance$. Syntax adds to lexicon the position
-- information.
AdjDegr = AdjComp ** {p : Bool} ;
mkAdjDegr : AdjComp -> Bool -> AdjDegr = \adj,p ->
adj ** {p = p} ;
mkAdjDegrLong : Adj -> Bool -> AdjDegr = \adj,p ->
adjCompLong adj ** {p = p} ;
-- Each of the comparison forms has a characteristic use:
--
-- Positive forms are used alone, as adjectival phrases ("bon").
positAdjPhrase : AdjDegr -> AdjPhrase = \bon ->
{s = bon.s ! Pos ;
p = bon.p
} ;
-- Comparative forms are used with an object of comparison, as
-- adjectival phrases ("meilleur que toi"). The comparing conjunction
-- is of course language-dependent; Italian moreover has the free
-- variants "che" and "di".
comparAdjPhrase : AdjDegr -> NounPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \bon, toi ->
{s = \\a => bon.s ! Comp ! a ++ comparConj ++
toi.s ! stressed accusative ;
p = False
} ;
comparConj : Str ;
-- Superlative forms are used with a common noun, picking out the
-- maximal representative of a domain
-- ("le meilleur mec", "le mec le plus intelligent").
superlNounPhrase : AdjDegr -> CommNoun -> NounPhrase = \bon, mec ->
normalNounPhrase
(\\c => artDef mec.g Sg c ++ if_then_else Str bon.p
(bon.s ! Comp ! AF mec.g Sg ++ mec.s ! Sg)
(mec.s ! Sg ++ artDef mec.g Sg nominative ++ bon.s ! Comp ! AF mec.g Sg)
)
mec.g
Sg ;
superlAdjPhrase : AdjDegr -> AdjPhrase = \bon ->
{s = \\a => artDef (genAForm a) (numAForm a) nominative ++ bon.s ! Comp ! a ;
p = bon.p
} ;
-- Sentence-complement adjectives.
---- Need proper mode in the negative case.
predAdjSent : (Adjective ** {mp,mn : Mode}) -> Sentence -> Clause =
\adj,ildort ->
sats2clause (
insertExtrapos (mkSatsCopula pronImpers (adj.s ! AF Masc Sg))
(\\b => embedConj ++ ildort.s ! if_then_else Mode b adj.mp adj.mn)) ;
predAdjSent2 : (AdjCompl ** {mp,mn : Mode}) -> NounPhrase ->
( Adjective ** {mp,mn : Mode}) = \facile,jean ->
complAdj facile jean ** {mp = facile.mp ; mn = facile.mn} ;
pronImpers : NounPhrase ;
-- $pronImpers = pronNounPhrase pronIl$ in French, empty in Italian
-- and Spanish.
--3 Prepositions and complements
--
-- Most prepositions are just strings. But "à" and "de" are treated as cases in
-- French. In Italian, there are more prepositions treated in this way:
-- "a", "di", "da", "in", "su", "con".
-- An invariant is that, if the preposition is not empty ($[]$), then the case
-- is $Acc$.
Preposition = Str ;
Complement = {s2 : Preposition ; c : CaseA} ;
complement : Str -> Complement = \par ->
{s2 = par ; c = nominative} ;
complementDir : Complement = complement [] ;
complementCas : CaseA -> Complement = \c ->
{s2 = [] ; c = c} ;
--3 Two-place adjectives
--
-- A two-place adjective is an adjective with a preposition used before
-- the complement, and the complement case.
AdjCompl = AdjPhrase ** Complement ;
mkAdjCompl : Adj -> Bool -> Complement -> AdjCompl = \adj,p,c ->
mkAdjective adj p ** c ;
complAdj : AdjCompl -> NounPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \relie,jean ->
{s = \\a => relie.s ! a ++ relie.s2 ++ jean.s ! case2pform relie.c ;
p = False
} ;
--3 Modification of common nouns
--
-- The two main functions of adjective are in predication ("Jean est jeune")
-- and in modification ("un jeune homme"). Predication will be defined
-- later, in the chapter on verbs.
--
-- Modification must pay attention to pre- and post-noun
-- adjectives: "jeune homme"; "homme intelligent".
modCommNounPhrase : AdjPhrase -> CommNounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase = \bon,mec ->
{s = \\n => if_then_else Str bon.p
(bon.s ! AF mec.g n ++ mec.s ! n)
(mec.s ! n ++ bon.s ! AF mec.g n) ;
g = mec.g
} ;
--2 Function expressions
-- A function expression is a common noun together with the
-- preposition prefixed to its argument ("mère de x").
-- The type is analogous to two-place adjectives and transitive verbs.
Function : Type = CommNounPhrase ** Complement ;
-- The application of a function gives, in the first place, a common noun:
-- "mor/mödrar till Johan". From this, other rules of the resource grammar
-- give noun phrases, such as "la mère de Jean", "les mères de Jean",
-- "les mères de Jean et de Marie", and "la mère de Jean et de Marie" (the
-- latter two corresponding to distributive and collective functions,
-- respectively). Semantics will eventually tell when each
-- of the readings is meaningful.
appFunComm : Function -> NounPhrase -> CommNounPhrase = \mere,jean ->
{s = \\n => mere.s ! n ++ mere.s2 ++ jean.s ! case2pform mere.c ;
g = mere.g
} ;
-- Two-place functions add one argument place.
Function2 = Function ** {s3 : Preposition ; c3 : CaseA} ;
-- There application starts by filling the first place.
appFun2 : Function2 -> NounPhrase -> Function = \vol, paris ->
{s = \\n => vol.s ! n ++ vol.s2 ++ paris.s ! case2pform vol.c ;
g = vol.g ;
s2 = vol.s3 ;
c = vol.c3
} ;
-- It is possible to use a function word as a common noun; the semantics is
-- often existential or indexical.
funAsCommNounPhrase : Function -> CommNounPhrase = \x -> x ;
-- The following is an aggregate corresponding to the original function application
-- producing "ma mère" and "la mère de Jean". It does not appear in the
-- resource grammar API any longer.
appFun : Bool -> Function -> NounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \coll, mere, jean ->
let
n = jean.n ;
g = mere.g ; nf = if_then_else Number coll Sg n
in variants {
defNounPhrase nf (appFunComm mere jean) ;
npGenDet nf jean mere
} ;
--2 Verbs
--
--3 Verb phrases
--
-- Unlike many other languages, verb phrases in Romance languages
-- are not discontinuous.
-- We use clitic parameters instead.
--
-- (It is not quite sure, though, whether this
-- will suffice in French for examples like "je n'*y* vais pas": one may want to
-- add "y" to "ne vais pas" instead of "ne - pas" to "y vais".)
param
VPForm = VPF Anteriority VF ;
Anteriority = Simul | Anter ;
VIForm = VIInfinit | VIImperat Bool Number | VIGerund ;
oper
VerbPhrase = {s : VIForm => Gender => Number => Person => Str} ;
VerbClause = {s : Bool => Anteriority => VIForm => Gender => Number => Person => Str} ;
vpf2vf : VPForm -> VF = \vpf -> case vpf of {
VPF _ vf => vf
} ;
auxVerb : Verb -> Verb ; -- gives the auxiliary
nombreVerbPhrase : VPForm -> Number = \v -> case v of {
VPF _ f => nombreVerb f
} ;
personVerbPhrase : VPForm -> Person = \v -> case v of {
VPF _ f => personVerb f
} ;
isNotImperative : VPForm -> Bool = \v -> case v of {
VPF _ (VImper _) => False ;
_ => True
} ;
-- Predication is language-dependent in the negative case.
negVerb : Str -> Str ;
-- Verb phrases can also be formed from adjectives ("est bon"),
-- common nouns ("est un homme"), and noun phrases ("est Jean").
-- We need a copula, which is of course language-dependent.
copula : Verb ;
-- The third rule is overgenerating: "est chaque homme" has to be ruled out
-- on semantic grounds.
complVerbAdj : AdjCompl -> VerbPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \facile,ouvrir ->
{s = \\gn => ---- p
facile.s ! gn ++ prepCase facile.c ++ facile.s2 ++
ouvrir.s ! VIInfinit ! Masc ! Sg ! P3 ;
p = False
} ;
complVerbAdj2 : Bool -> AdjCompl -> NounPhrase -> VerbPhrase -> AdjPhrase =
\b,facile,lui,nager ->
{s = \\gn => ---- p
facile.s ! gn ++
lui.s ! stressed dative ++ ---- also "pour lui" ?
prepCase facile.c ++ facile.s2 ++
nager.s ! VIInfinit ! pgen2gen lui.g ! lui.n ! P3 ; ---- agr dep on b
p = False
} ;
-- complement a verb with noun phrase and optional preposition
TransVerb : Type = Verb ** Complement ;
complementOfTransVerb : TransVerb -> Complement = \v -> {s2 = v.s2 ; c = v.c} ;
verbOfTransVerb : TransVerb -> Verb = \v ->
{s = v.s ; aux = v.aux} ;
isNounPhraseClit : NounPhrase -> Bool = \n -> case n.c of {
Clit0 => False ;
_ => True
} ;
-- This function is language-dependent, because it uses the language-dependent
-- type of case.
isClitCase : CaseA -> Bool ;
isTransVerbClit : TransVerb -> Bool = \v -> isClitCase v.c ;
isDitransVerbClit : DitransVerb -> Bool * Bool = \v ->
<isClitCase v.c,isClitCase v.c3> ;
--3 Transitive verbs
--
-- Transitive verbs are verbs with a preposition for the complement,
-- in analogy with two-place adjectives and functions.
-- One might prefer to use the term "2-place verb", since
-- "transitive" traditionally means that the inherent preposition is empty.
-- Such a verb is one with a *direct object* - which may still be accusative,
-- dative, or genitive.
--
-- In complementation, we do need some dispatching of clitic types:
-- "aime Jean" ; "n'aime pas Jean" ; "l'aime" ; "ne l'aime pas".
-- More will be needed when we add ditransitive verbs.
reflPron : Number => Person => NPFormA => Str ;
reflPronNounPhrase : Gender -> Number -> Person -> NounPhrase = \g,n,p ->
{s = reflPron ! n ! p ;
g = PGen g ; -- needed in participle agreement
n = n ;
p = p ;
c = Clit1 ---- depends on person?
} ;
---- There is no adverbial form for the past participle.
adjPastPart : Verb -> Adjective = \verb -> {
s = table {
AF g n => verb.s ! VPart g n ;
AA => verb.s ! VPart Masc Sg
} ;
p = False
} ;
mkTransVerb : Verb -> Preposition -> CaseA -> TransVerb = \v,p,c ->
v ** {s2 = p ; c = c} ;
mkTransVerbPrep : Verb -> Preposition -> TransVerb = \passer,par ->
mkTransVerb passer par accusative ;
mkTransVerbCas : Verb -> CaseA -> TransVerb = \penser,a ->
mkTransVerb penser [] a ;
mkTransVerbDir : Verb -> TransVerb = \aimer ->
mkTransVerbCas aimer accusative ;
-- Transitive verbs can be used elliptically as verbs. The semantics
-- is left to applications. The definition is trivial, due to record
-- subtyping.
transAsVerb : TransVerb -> Verb = \love ->
love ;
-- *Ditransitive verbs* are verbs with three argument places.
-- We treat so far only the rule in which the ditransitive
-- verb takes both complements to form a verb phrase.
DitransVerb = TransVerb ** {s3 : Preposition ; c3 : CaseA} ;
mkDitransVerb :
Verb -> Preposition -> CaseA -> Preposition -> CaseA -> DitransVerb =
\v,p1,c1,p2,c2 ->
v ** {s2 = p1 ; c = c1 ; s3 = p2 ; c3 = c2} ;
--- This must be completed to account for the order of the clitics.
--- In the rule below, the last argument cannot get cliticized.
-- The following macro builds the "ne - pas" or "non" negation. The second
-- string argument is used for the complement of a verb phrase. In Italian,
-- one string argument would actually be enough.
posNeg : Bool -> (verb, compl : Str) -> Str ;
DitransVerbVerb = TransVerb ** {c3 : CaseA} ;
--2 Adverbs
--
-- Adverbs are not inflected (we ignore comparison, and treat
-- compared adverbs as separate expressions; this could be done another way).
--
-- (We should also take into account clitic ones, like "y",
-- as well as the position: "est toujours heureux" / "est heureux à Paris".)
Adverb : Type = SS ;
advVerbPhrase : VerbPhrase -> Adverb -> VerbPhrase = \chante, bien ->
{s = \\v,g,n,p => chante.s ! v ! g ! n ! p ++ bien.s} ;
-- Adverbs are typically generated by prefixing prepositions.
-- The rule for prepositional phrases also comprises the use of prepositions
-- treated as cases. Therefore, both a preposition and a case are needed
-- as arguments.
prepNounPhrase : {s : Preposition ; c : CaseA} -> NounPhrase -> Adverb = \dans,jean ->
{s = dans.s ++ jean.s ! Ton dans.c} ;
justPrep : Preposition -> {s : Preposition ; c : CaseA} = \sans ->
{s = sans ; c = prepositional} ;
justCase : CaseA -> {s : Preposition ; c : CaseA} = \nom ->
{s = [] ; c = nom} ;
-- This is a source of the "homme avec un téléscope" ambiguity, and may produce
-- strange things, like "les voitures toujours".
-- Semantics will have to make finer distinctions among adverbials.
-- French moreover says "les voitures d'hier" rather than "les voitures hier".
advCommNounPhrase : CommNounPhrase -> Adverb -> CommNounPhrase = \mec,aparis ->
{s = \\n => mec.s ! n ++ aparis.s ;
g = mec.g
} ;
advAdjPhrase : Adverb -> AdjPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \trop,lent ->
{s = \\a => trop.s ++ lent.s ! a ;
p = lent.p
} ;
--2 Sentences
--
-- Sentences depend on a *mode parameter* selecting between
-- indicative and subjunctive forms.
Sentence : Type = SS1 Mode ;
-- This is the traditional $S -> NP VP$ rule. It takes care of both
-- mode and agreement.
param
Tense = Present | Past | Future | Condit ;
ClForm =
ClPres Anteriority Mode
| ClImperf Anteriority Mode
| ClPasse Anteriority
| ClFut Anteriority
| ClCondit Anteriority
| ClInfinit Anteriority -- "naked infinitive" clauses
;
oper
useClForm : Tense -> Anteriority -> Mode -> ClForm =
\t,a,m -> case t of {
Present => ClPres a m ;
Past => ClImperf a m ; --- no passé simple
Future => ClFut a ; ---- mode
Condit => ClCondit a
} ;
Clause = {s : Bool => ClForm => Str} ;
--3 Sentence-complement verbs
--
-- Sentence-complement verbs take sentences as complements.
-- The mode of the complement depends on the verb, and can be different
-- for positive and negative uses of the verb
-- ("je crois qu'elle vient" -"je ne crois pas qu'elle vienne"),
SentenceVerb : Type = Verb ** {mp, mn : Mode} ;
subordMode : SentenceVerb -> Bool -> Mode = \verb,b ->
if_then_else Mode b verb.mp verb.mn ;
verbSent : Verb -> Mode -> Mode -> SentenceVerb = \v,mp,mn ->
v ** {mp = mp ; mn = mn} ;
-- The embedding conjunction is language dependent.
embedConj : Str ;
--3 Verb-complement verbs
--
-- Verb-complement verbs take verb phrases as complements.
-- They can need an oblique case ("à", "de"), but they work like ordinary verbs.
VerbVerb : Type = Verb ** {c : CaseA} ;
mkVerbVerbDir : Verb -> VerbVerb = \v -> v ** {c = accusative} ;
--2 Sentences missing noun phrases
--
-- This is one instance of Gazdar's *slash categories*, corresponding to his
-- $S/NP$.
-- We cannot have - nor would we want to have - a productive slash-category former.
-- Perhaps a handful more will be needed.
--
-- Notice that the slash category has the same relation to sentences as
-- transitive verbs have to verbs: it's like a *sentence taking a complement*.
ClauseSlashNounPhrase = Clause ** Complement ;
dummyNounPhrase : NounPhrase = mkNameNounPhrase [] Masc ;
slashTransVerb : NounPhrase -> TransVerb -> ClauseSlashNounPhrase = \np,v ->
sats2clause (mkSatsObject np v dummyNounPhrase) **
complementOfTransVerb v ;
slashVerbVerb : NounPhrase -> VerbVerb -> TransVerb -> ClauseSlashNounPhrase =
\subj, verb, tv ->
sats2clause (
insertExtrapos
(mkSats subj verb)
(\\_ => prepCase verb.c ++ tv.s ! VInfin)
) ** complementOfTransVerb tv ;
slashAdverb : Clause -> {s : Str ; c : CaseA} -> ClauseSlashNounPhrase =
\ilhabite,dans -> ilhabite ** {s2 = dans.s ; c = dans.c} ;
--2 Relative pronouns and relative clauses
--
-- Relative pronouns are inflected in
-- gender, number, and case. They can also have an inherent case,
-- but this case is 'variable' in the sense that it
-- is sometimes just mediated from the correlate
-- ("homme qui est bon"), sometimes inherent to the
-- pronominal phrase itself ("homme dont la mère est bonne").
oper
RelPron : Type = {s : RelFormA => Str ; g : RelGen} ;
---- RelClause : Type = {s : Bool => ClForm => Gender => Number => Person => Str} ;
RelClause : Type = {
s1 : Gender => Number => Person => Str ;
s2 : Bool => ClForm => Gender => Number => Person => Str ;
s3 : Bool => Str
} ;
RelSentence : Type = {s : Mode => Gender => Number => Person => Str} ;
mkGenRel : RelGen -> Gender -> Gender = \rg,g -> case rg of {
PGen gen => gen ;
_ => g
} ;
-- Simple relative pronouns ("qui", "dont", "par laquelle")
-- have no inherent gender.
identRelPron : RelPron ;
composRelPron : Gender -> Number -> CaseA -> Str ;
-- Complex relative pronouns ("dont la mère") do have an inherent gender.
funRelPron : Function -> RelPron -> RelPron ;
-- There are often variants, i.e. short and long forms
-- ("que" - "lequel", "dont" -"duquel"), etc.
allRelForms : RelPron -> Gender -> Number -> CaseA -> Str ;
-- Relative clauses can be formed from both verb phrases ("qui dort") and
-- slash expressions ("que je vois", "dont je parle").
relSlash : RelPron -> ClauseSlashNounPhrase -> RelClause = \dont,jeparle ->
{s1 = \\g,n,p => jeparle.s2 ++ allRelForms dont g n jeparle.c ;
s2 = \\b,cl,g,n,p => jeparle.s ! b ! cl ;
s3 = \\_ => [] ---- should be parts of jeparle
} ;
-- A 'degenerate' relative clause is the one often used in mathematics, e.g.
-- "nombre x tel que x soit pair".
relSuch : Clause -> RelClause = \A ->
{s1 = \\g,n,p => suchPron g n ;
s2 = \\b,cl,g,n,p => embedConj ++ A.s ! b ! cl ;
s3 = \\_ => [] ---- should be parts of A
} ;
suchPron : Gender -> Number -> Str ;
-- The main use of relative clauses is to modify common nouns.
-- The result is a common noun, out of which noun phrases can be formed
-- by determiners. A comma is used before the relative clause.
--
-- N.B. subjunctive relative clauses
-- ("je cherche un mec qui sache chanter") must have another structure
-- (unless common noun phrases are given a mode parameter...).
modRelClause : CommNounPhrase -> RelSentence -> CommNounPhrase = \mec,quidort ->
{s = \\n => mec.s ! n ++ quidort.s ! Ind ! mec.g ! n ! P3 ;
g = mec.g
} ;
--2 Interrogative pronouns
--
-- If relative pronouns are adjective-like, interrogative pronouns are
-- noun-phrase-like. We use a simplified type, since we don't need the possessive
-- forms.
--
-- N.B. "est-ce que", etc, will be added below
-- when pronouns are used in direct questions.
IntPron : Type = {s : CaseA => Str ; g : Gender ; n : Number} ;
-- In analogy with relative pronouns, we have a rule for applying a function
-- to a relative pronoun to create a new one.
funIntPron : Function -> IntPron -> IntPron = \mere,qui ->
{s = \\c =>
artDef mere.g qui.n c ++ mere.s ! qui.n ++ mere.s2 ++ qui.s ! mere.c ;
g = mere.g ;
n = qui.n
} ;
-- There is a variety of simple interrogative pronouns:
-- "quelle maison", "qui", "quoi". Their definitions are language-dependent.
nounIntPron : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> IntPron ;
intPronWho : Number -> IntPron ;
intPronWhat : Number -> IntPron ;
--2 Utterances
-- By utterances we mean whole phrases, such as
-- 'can be used as moves in a language game': indicatives, questions, imperative,
-- and one-word utterances. The rules are far from complete.
--
-- N.B. we have not included rules for texts, which we find we cannot say much
-- about on this level. In semantically rich GF grammars, texts, dialogues, etc,
-- will of course play an important role as categories not reducible to utterances.
-- An example is proof texts, whose semantics show a dependence between premises
-- and conclusions. Another example is intersentential anaphora.
Utterance = SS ;
indicUtt : Sentence -> Utterance = \x -> ss (x.s ! Ind ++ ".") ;
interrogUtt : QuestionSent -> Utterance = \x -> ss (x.s ! DirQ ++ "?") ;
--2 Questions
--
-- Questions are either direct ("qui a pris la voiture") or indirect
-- ("ce qui a pris la voiture").
param
QuestForm = DirQ | IndirQ ;
oper
Question = {s : Bool => ClForm => QuestForm => Str} ;
QuestionSent = {s : QuestForm => Str} ;
--3 Yes-no questions
--
-- Yes-no questions are used both independently ("Tu es fatigué?")
-- and after interrogative adverbials ("Pourquoi tu es fatigué?").
-- It is economical to handle with these two cases by the one
-- rule, $questVerbPhrase'$. The only difference is if "si" appears
-- in the indirect form.
--
-- N.B. the inversion variant ("Es-tu fatigué?") is missing, mainly because our
-- verb morphology does not support the intervening "t" ("Marche-t-il?").
-- The leading "est-ce que" is recognized as a variant, and requires
-- direct word order.
questClause : Clause -> Question = \cl ->
{s = \\b,c => table {
DirQ => cl.s ! b ! c ;
IndirQ => siSubj.s ++ cl.s ! b ! c
}
} ;
----- questVerbPhrase : NounPhrase -> VerbPhrase -> Question ;
--3 Wh-questions
--
-- Wh-questions are of two kinds: ones that are like $NP - VP$ sentences,
-- others that are line $S/NP - NP$ sentences.
--
-- N.B. inversion variants and "est-ce que" are treated as above.
intSlash : IntPron -> ClauseSlashNounPhrase -> Question ;
intNounPhrase : IntPron -> NounPhrase = \ip ->
{s = \\nf => ip.s ! pform2case nf ; g = PGen ip.g ; n = ip.n ; p = P3 ; c = Clit0} ;
--3 Interrogative adverbials
--
-- These adverbials will be defined in the lexicon: they include
-- "quand", "où", "comment", "pourquoi", etc, which are all invariant one-word
-- expressions. In addition, they can be formed by adding prepositions
-- to interrogative pronouns, in the same way as adverbials are formed
-- from noun phrases.
--
-- N.B. inversion variants and "est-ce que" are treated as above.
IntAdverb = SS ;
questAdverbial : IntAdverb -> Clause -> Question =
\quand, jeanDort ->
{s = \\b,cl =>
let
jeandort = jeanDort.s ! b ! cl
in
table {
DirQ => quand.s ++ jeandort ; ---- est-ce que
IndirQ => quand.s ++ jeandort
}
} ;
--2 Imperatives
--
-- We only consider second-person imperatives.
--
-- N.B. following the API, we don't distinguish between
-- singular and plural "vous", nor between masculine and feminine.
-- when forming utterances.
--
-- TODO: clitics, Italian negated imperative.
Imperative = {s : Gender => Number => Str} ;
imperVerbPhrase : Bool -> VerbClause -> Imperative = \b,dormir ->
{s = \\g,n => dormir.s ! b ! Simul ! VIImperat b n ! g ! n ! P2
} ;
imperUtterance : Number -> Imperative -> Utterance = \n,I ->
ss (I.s ! Masc ! n ++ "!") ;
--2 Sentence adverbials
--
-- Sentence adverbs is the largest class and open for
-- e.g. prepositional phrases.
advClause : Clause -> Adverb -> Clause = \yousing,well ->
{s = \\b,c => yousing.s ! b ! c ++ well.s} ;
-- Another class covers adverbials such as "autrement", "donc", which are prefixed
-- to a sentence to form a phrase.
advSentence : SS -> Sentence -> Utterance = \donc,ildort ->
ss (donc.s ++ ildort.s ! Ind ++ ".") ;
--2 Coordination
--
-- Coordination is to some extent orthogonal to the rest of syntax, and
-- has been treated in a generic way in the module $CO$ in the file
-- $coordination.gf$. The overall structure is independent of category,
-- but there can be differences in parameter dependencies.
--
--3 Conjunctions
--
-- Coordinated phrases are built by using conjunctions, which are either
-- simple ("et", "ou") or distributed ("et - et", "pu - ou").
Conjunction = CO.Conjunction ** {n : Number} ;
ConjunctionDistr = CO.ConjunctionDistr ** {n : Number} ;
--3 Coordinating sentences
--
-- We need a category of lists of sentences. It is a discontinuous
-- category, the parts corresponding to 'init' and 'last' segments
-- (rather than 'head' and 'tail', because we have to keep track of the slot between
-- the last two elements of the list). A list has at least two elements.
--
-- N.B. we don't have repetion of "que" in subordinate coordinated sentences.
ListSentence : Type = {s1,s2 : Mode => Str} ;
twoSentence : (_,_ : Sentence) -> ListSentence =
CO.twoTable Mode ;
consSentence : ListSentence -> Sentence -> ListSentence =
CO.consTable Mode CO.comma ;
-- To coordinate a list of sentences by a simple conjunction, we place
-- it between the last two elements; commas are put in the other slots,
-- e.g. "Pierre fume, Jean boit et les autres regardsnt".
conjunctSentence : Conjunction -> ListSentence -> Sentence =
CO.conjunctTable Mode ;
-- To coordinate a list of sentences by a distributed conjunction, we place
-- the first part in front of the first element, the second
-- part between the last two elements, and commas in the other slots.
-- For sentences this is really not used.
conjunctDistrSentence : ConjunctionDistr -> ListSentence -> Sentence =
CO.conjunctDistrTable Mode ;
--3 Coordinating adjective phrases
--
-- The structure is the same as for sentences. The result is a prefix adjective
-- if and only if all elements are prefix.
ListAdjPhrase : Type =
{s1,s2 : AForm => Str ; p : Bool} ;
twoAdjPhrase : (_,_ : AdjPhrase) -> ListAdjPhrase = \x,y ->
CO.twoTable AForm x y ** {p = andB x.p y.p} ;
consAdjPhrase : ListAdjPhrase -> AdjPhrase -> ListAdjPhrase = \xs,x ->
CO.consTable AForm CO.comma xs x ** {p = andB xs.p x.p} ;
conjunctAdjPhrase : Conjunction -> ListAdjPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \c,xs ->
CO.conjunctTable AForm c xs ** {p = xs.p} ;
conjunctDistrAdjPhrase : ConjunctionDistr -> ListAdjPhrase -> AdjPhrase = \c,xs ->
CO.conjunctDistrTable AForm c xs ** {p = xs.p} ;
--3 Coordinating noun phrases
--
-- The structure is the same as for sentences. The result is either always plural
-- or plural if any of the components is, depending on the conjunction.
-- The gender is masculine if any of the components is. A coordinated noun phrase
-- cannot be clitic.
ListNounPhrase : Type =
{s1,s2 : CaseA => Str ; g : PronGen ; n : Number ; p : Person} ;
twoNounPhrase : (_,_ : NounPhrase) -> ListNounPhrase = \x,y ->
{s1 = \\c => x.s ! stressed c ;
s2 = \\c => y.s ! stressed (conjunctCase c)} **
{n = conjNumber x.n y.n ; g = conjGender x.g y.g ; p = conjPers x.p y.p} ;
consNounPhrase : ListNounPhrase -> NounPhrase -> ListNounPhrase = \xs,x ->
{s1 = \\c => xs.s1 ! c ++ CO.comma ++ xs.s2 ! conjunctCase c ;
s2 = \\c => x.s ! stressed (conjunctCase c)} **
{n = conjNumber xs.n x.n ; g = conjGender xs.g x.g ; p =conjPers xs.p x.p} ;
-- French says "la somme de x et de y" whereas
-- Italian says "la somma di x e y" and similarly for Spanish.
conjunctCase : CaseA -> CaseA ;
-- conjunctCase c = nominative ; -- Spanish, Italian
-- conjunctCase c = c ; -- French
conjunctNounPhrase : Conjunction -> ListNounPhrase -> NounPhrase = \co,xs ->
{s = \\c => xs.s1 ! pform2case c ++ co.s ++ xs.s2 ! pform2case c} **
{n = conjNumber co.n xs.n ; g = xs.g ; p = xs.p ; c = Clit0 } ;
conjunctDistrNounPhrase : ConjunctionDistr -> ListNounPhrase -> NounPhrase =
\co,xs ->
{s = \\c => co.s1++ xs.s1 ! pform2case c ++ co.s2 ++ xs.s2 ! pform2case c} **
{n = conjNumber co.n xs.n ; g = xs.g ; p = xs.p ; c = Clit0} ;
-- We have to define a calculus of numbers of genders. For numbers,
-- it is like the conjunction with $Pl$ corresponding to $False$. For genders,
-- $Masc$ corresponds to $False$.
conjNumber : Number -> Number -> Number = \m,n -> case <m,n> of {
<Sg,Sg> => Sg ;
_ => Pl
} ;
conjGen : Gender -> Gender -> Gender = \m,n -> case <m,n> of {
<Fem,Fem> => Fem ;
_ => Masc
} ;
conjGender : PronGen -> PronGen -> PronGen = \m,n -> case <m,n> of {
<PGen Fem, PGen Fem> => PGen Fem ;
_ => PNoGen
} ;
-- For persons, we go in the descending order:
-- "moi et toi sommes forts", "lui ou toi es fort".
-- This is not always quite clear.
conjPers : Person -> Person -> Person = \p,q -> case <p,q> of {
<P3,P3> => P3 ;
<P1,_> => P1 ;
<_,P1> => P1 ;
_ => P2
} ;
--3 Coordinating adverbs
--
-- We need a category of lists of adverbs. It is a discontinuous
-- category, the parts corresponding to 'init' and 'last' segments
-- (rather than 'head' and 'tail', because we have to keep track of the slot between
-- the last two elements of the list). A list has at least two elements.
ListAdverb : Type = SD2 ;
twoAdverb : (_,_ : Adverb) -> ListAdverb = CO.twoSS ;
consAdverb : ListAdverb -> Adverb -> ListAdverb =
CO.consSS CO.comma ;
-- To coordinate a list of adverbs by a simple conjunction, we place
-- it between the last two elements; commas are put in the other slots,
conjunctAdverb : Conjunction -> ListAdverb -> Adverb = \c,xs ->
ss (CO.conjunctX c xs) ;
-- To coordinate a list of adverbs by a distributed conjunction, we place
-- the first part (e.g. "either") in front of the first element, the second
-- part ("or") between the last two elements, and commas in the other slots.
conjunctDistrAdverb : ConjunctionDistr -> ListAdverb -> Adverb =
\c,xs ->
ss (CO.conjunctDistrX c xs) ;
--2 Subjunction
--
-- Subjunctions ("si", "quand", etc)
-- are a different way to combine sentences than conjunctions.
-- The main clause can be a sentences, an imperatives, or a question,
-- but the subjoined clause must be a sentence. The inherent mood can be
-- indicative ("si", "quand") or subjunctive ("bien que").
Subjunction = {s : Str ; m : Mode} ;
subjunctSentence : Subjunction -> Sentence -> Sentence -> Sentence = \si,A,B ->
{s = \\m => subjunctVariants si A (B.s ! m)
} ;
subjunctImperative : Subjunction -> Sentence -> Imperative -> Imperative =
\si,A,B ->
{s = \\g,n => subjunctVariants si A (B.s ! g ! n)
} ;
subjunctQuestion : Subjunction -> Sentence -> QuestionSent -> QuestionSent = \si,A,B ->
{s = \\q => subjunctVariants si A (B.s ! q)
} ;
-- There are uniformly two variant word orders, e.g.
-- "si tu fumes je m'en vais"
-- and "je m'en vais si tu fumes".
subjunctVariants : Subjunction -> Sentence -> Str -> Str = \si,A,B ->
let {As = A.s ! si.m} in
variants {
si.s ++ As ++ B ;
B ++ si.s ++ As
} ;
--2 One-word utterances
--
-- An utterance can consist of one phrase of almost any category,
-- the limiting case being one-word utterances. These
-- utterances are often (but not always) in what can be called the
-- default form of a category, e.g. the nominative.
-- This list is far from exhaustive.
useNounPhrase : NounPhrase -> Utterance = \jean ->
postfixSS "." (defaultNounPhrase jean) ;
useCommonNounPhrase : Number -> CommNounPhrase -> Utterance = \n,mec ->
useNounPhrase (indefNounPhrase n mec) ;
verbUtterance : VerbPhrase -> Utterance = \vp ->
ss (vp.s ! VIInfinit ! Masc ! Sg ! P3 ++ ".") ;
-- one-form variants
defaultNounPhrase : NounPhrase -> SS = \jean ->
ss (jean.s ! stressed nominative) ;
defaultQuestion : QuestionSent -> SS = \quiesttu ->
ss (quiesttu.s ! DirQ) ;
defaultSentence : Sentence -> SS = \x -> ss (x.s ! Ind) ;
----- moved from Types
artDef : Gender -> Number -> CaseA -> Str ;
artIndef : Gender -> Number -> CaseA -> Str ;
genForms : Str -> Str -> Gender => Str ;
----- moved from Res ; should not be here (pronouns are also in MorphoIta...)
pronJe, pronTu, pronIl, pronElle, pronNous, pronVous, pronIls, pronElles :
Pronoun ;
chaqueDet, quelDet, plupartDet : Determiner ;
commentAdv, quandAdv, ouAdv, pourquoiAdv : Adverb ;
etConj, ouConj : Conjunction ;
etetConj, ououConj : ConjunctionDistr ;
siSubj, quandSubj : Subjunction ;
ouiPhr, noPhr : Utterance ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---- for Sats; to be moved earlier
Sats : Type = {
s1 : Str ; -- je je
s3 : Str ; -- (ne) le lui (ne)
s4 : VF => Str ; -- ai ai
s5 : Str ; -- toujours (pas) toujours (pas)
s6 : Str ; -- (dit) directement (voulu) le lui dire directement
s7 : Bool => Str; -- qu'il pleu/pleuve
aux : VAux ;
g,g2 : Gender ; -- features for main verb and participle
n,n2 : Number ;
p : Person -- feature of subject
} ;
verbClForm :
Verb -> ClForm -> Gender -> Number -> Person -> Gender -> Number -> (Str * Str) =
\verb,cl,g,n,p,g2,n2 ->
let
aimee = verb.s ! VPart g2 n2 ;
auxv = (auxVerb verb).s ;
aime : TMode -> Str = \t -> verb.s ! (VFin t n p) ;
avoir : TMode -> Str = \t -> auxv ! (VFin t n p) ;
aimer = verb.s ! VInfin ;
avoirr = auxv ! VInfin
in
case cl of {
ClPres Simul m => <aime (VPres m), []> ;
ClPres a m => <avoir (VPres m), aimee> ;
ClImperf Simul m => <aime (VImperf m), []> ;
ClImperf a m => <avoir (VImperf m), aimee> ;
ClPasse Simul => <aime VPasse, []> ;
ClPasse a => <avoir VPasse, aimee> ;
ClFut Simul => <aime VFut, []> ;
ClFut a => <avoir VFut, aimee> ;
ClCondit Simul => <aime VCondit, []> ;
ClCondit a => <avoir VCondit, aimee> ;
ClInfinit Simul => <aimer, []> ;
ClInfinit a => <avoirr, aimee>
} ;
mkSats : NounPhrase -> Verb -> Sats = \subj,verb ->
let ifEsse : (T : Type) -> T -> T -> T = \T,e,h ->
case verb.aux of {
AEsse => e ;
AHabere => h
}
in
{s1 = subj.s ! unstressed nominative ;
s3 = [] ;
s4 = verb.s ;
s5, s6 = [] ;
s7 = \\_ => [] ;
aux = verb.aux ;
g = pgen2gen subj.g ;
n = subj.n ;
p = subj.p ;
g2 = ifEsse Gender (pgen2gen subj.g) Masc ;
n2 = ifEsse Number subj.n Sg
} ;
insertObject : Sats -> CaseA -> Str -> NounPhrase -> Sats = \sats, c, prep, obj ->
let
ifClit : (T : Type) -> T -> T -> T =
\T -> if_then_else T (andB (isNounPhraseClit obj) (isClitCase c)) ;
object = obj.s ! (case2pformClit c) ;
clit = ifClit Str object [] ;
np = ifClit Str [] object
in
{s1 = sats.s1 ;
s3 = sats.s3 ++ clit ; ---- or clit ++ s3, dep. on clits
s4 = sats.s4 ;
s5 = sats.s5 ;
s6 = sats.s6 ++ prep ++ np ;
s7 = sats.s7 ;
aux = sats.aux ;
g = sats.g ;
n = sats.n ;
g2 = ifClit Gender (pgen2gen obj.g) sats.g2 ; ---- only for clit acc
n2 = ifClit Number obj.n sats.n2 ;
p = sats.p
} ;
insertExtrapos : Sats -> (Bool => Str) -> Sats = \sats,obj ->
{s1 = sats.s1 ;
s3 = sats.s3 ;
s4 = sats.s4 ;
s5 = sats.s5 ;
s6 = sats.s6 ;
s7 = obj ;
aux = sats.aux ;
g = sats.g ;
n = sats.n ;
g2 = sats.g2 ;
n2 = sats.n2 ;
p = sats.p
} ;
mkSatsObject : NounPhrase -> TransVerb -> NounPhrase -> Sats = \subj,verb,obj ->
insertObject (mkSats subj verb) verb.c verb.s2 obj ;
mkSatsCopula : NounPhrase -> Str -> Sats = \subj,obj ->
mkSatsObject subj
(mkTransVerbDir copula) --- hack to reuse
(nameNounPhrase (mkProperName obj Masc)) ; --- this function
sats2clause : Sats -> Clause =
\sats -> {s = \\b,cf =>
let
je = sats.s1 ;
lui = sats.s3 ;
dire = verbClForm {s = sats.s4 ; aux = sats.aux}
cf sats.g sats.n sats.p sats.g2 sats.n2 ;
ai = dire.p1 ;
dit = dire.p2 ;
toujours = sats.s5 ;
directement = sats.s6 ;
ne = if_then_Str b [] negNe ;
pas = if_then_Str b [] negPas ;
oui = sats.s7 ! b
in
je ++ ne ++ lui ++ ai ++ toujours ++ pas ++ dit ++ directement ++ oui
} ;
negNe, negPas : Str ;
sats2quest : Sats -> Question = \x ->
let cl = sats2clause x
in
{s = \\b,f,_ => cl.s ! b ! f} ;
sats2rel : (Gender -> Number -> Person -> Sats) -> RelClause = \s ->
{s1 = \\g,n,p =>
let
sats = s g n p ;
in
sats.s1 ;
s2 = \\b,cf,g,n,p =>
let
sats = s g n p ;
lui = sats.s3 ;
dire = verbClForm {s = sats.s4 ; aux = sats.aux}
cf sats.g sats.n sats.p sats.g2 sats.n2 ;
ai = dire.p1 ;
toujours = sats.s5 ;
dit = dire.p2 ;
ne = if_then_Str b [] negNe ;
pas = if_then_Str b [] negPas ;
in
ne ++ lui ++ ai ++ toujours ++ pas ++ dit ;
s3 = \\b =>
let
sats = s Masc Sg P3 ;
directement = sats.s6 ;
oui = sats.s7 ! b
in
directement ++ oui
} ;
{-
sats2rel : (Gender -> Number -> Person -> Sats) -> RelClause = \sats ->
{s = \\b,f,g,n,p =>
(sats2clause (sats g n p)).s ! b ! f
} ;
-}
relNounPhrase : RelPron -> Gender -> Number -> Person -> NounPhrase =
\r,g,n,p -> {
s = \\np => r.s ! npRelForm np ;
g = PGen g ; --- r.g
n = n ;
p = p ;
c = Clit0 ;
} ;
sats2verbPhrase : Sats -> VerbClause =
\sats -> {s = \\b,ant,vi,g,n,p =>
let
lui = sats.s3 ;
dire = verbVIForm {s = sats.s4 ; aux = sats.aux} ant
vi g n p sats.g2 sats.n2 ;
ai = dire.p1 ;
dit = dire.p2 ;
toujours = sats.s5 ;
directement = sats.s6 ;
ne = if_then_Str b [] negNe ;
pas = if_then_Str b [] negPas ;
oui = sats.s7 ! b
in
ne ++ lui ++ ai ++ toujours ++ pas ++ dit ++ directement ++ oui
} ;
---- What happens to polarity and anteriority ?
verbVIForm :
Verb -> Anteriority ->
VIForm -> Gender -> Number -> Person -> Gender -> Number -> (Str * Str) =
\verb,ant,cl,g,n,p,g2,n2 ->
let
aime : Number -> Str = \t -> verb.s ! vImper t P2 ;
aimee = case ant of {Simul => [] ; _ => verb.s ! VPart Masc Sg} ; ---- g n
finverb = case ant of {Simul => verb.s ; _ => (auxVerb verb).s} ;
aimer = finverb ! VInfin ;
aimant = finverb ! VGer
in
case cl of {
VIImperat _ n => <aime n, []> ; -- no imperative perfect
VIGerund => <aimant, aimee> ;
VIInfinit => <aimer, aimee>
} ;
predVerb0 : Verb -> Clause = \rain ->
sats2clause (mkSats (pronNounPhrase pronImpers) rain) ;
progressiveSats : NounPhrase -> VerbPhrase -> Sats ;
}