forked from GitHub/gf-core
Simple transfer tutorial touch-up.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,44 +1,12 @@
|
||||
import prelude
|
||||
import tree
|
||||
|
||||
derive Eq Tree
|
||||
derive Compos Tree
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- When the Transfer compiler gets meta variable inference,
|
||||
-- we can write:
|
||||
{-
|
||||
aggreg : (A : Type) -> Tree A -> Tree A
|
||||
aggreg _ t =
|
||||
case t of
|
||||
ConjS c s1 s2 ->
|
||||
case (aggreg ? s1, aggreg ? s2) of
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | np1 == np2 ->
|
||||
Pred np1 (ConjVP c vp1 vp2)
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | vp1 == vp2 ->
|
||||
Pred (ConjNP c np1 np2) vp1
|
||||
(s1',s2') -> ConjS c s1' s2'
|
||||
_ -> composOp ? ? ? ? aggreg t
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
-- Adding hidden arguments, we could write something like:
|
||||
{-
|
||||
aggreg : (A : Type) => Tree A -> Tree A
|
||||
aggreg t =
|
||||
case t of
|
||||
ConjS c s1 s2 ->
|
||||
case (aggreg s1, aggreg s2) of
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | np1 == np2 ->
|
||||
Pred np1 (ConjVP c vp1 vp2)
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | vp1 == vp2 ->
|
||||
Pred (ConjNP c np1 np2) vp1
|
||||
(s1',s2') -> ConjS c s1' s2'
|
||||
_ -> composOp aggreg t
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
-- aggreg specialized for Tree S
|
||||
aggregS : Tree S -> Tree S
|
||||
aggregS = aggreg S
|
||||
|
||||
-- For now, here's what we have to do:
|
||||
|
||||
aggreg : (A : Type) -> Tree A -> Tree A
|
||||
aggreg _ t =
|
||||
case t of
|
||||
@@ -52,6 +20,37 @@ aggreg _ t =
|
||||
_ -> composOp ? ? compos_Tree ? aggreg t
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- aggreg specialized for Tree S
|
||||
aggregS : Tree S -> Tree S
|
||||
aggregS = aggreg S
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{-
|
||||
-- When the Transfer compiler gets meta variable inference,
|
||||
-- we can write this:
|
||||
aggreg : (A : Type) -> Tree A -> Tree A
|
||||
aggreg _ t =
|
||||
case t of
|
||||
ConjS c s1 s2 ->
|
||||
case (aggreg ? s1, aggreg ? s2) of
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | np1 == np2 ->
|
||||
Pred np1 (ConjVP c vp1 vp2)
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | vp1 == vp2 ->
|
||||
Pred (ConjNP c np1 np2) vp1
|
||||
(s1',s2') -> ConjS c s1' s2'
|
||||
_ -> composOp ? ? ? ? aggreg t
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{-
|
||||
-- If we added idden arguments, we could write something like this:
|
||||
aggreg : (A : Type) => Tree A -> Tree A
|
||||
aggreg t =
|
||||
case t of
|
||||
ConjS c s1 s2 ->
|
||||
case (aggreg s1, aggreg s2) of
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | np1 == np2 ->
|
||||
Pred np1 (ConjVP c vp1 vp2)
|
||||
(Pred np1 vp1, Pred np2 vp2) | vp1 == vp2 ->
|
||||
Pred (ConjNP c np1 np2) vp1
|
||||
(s1',s2') -> ConjS c s1' s2'
|
||||
_ -> composOp aggreg t
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user