forked from GitHub/gf-core
Founding the newly structured GF2.0 cvs archive.
This commit is contained in:
82
grammars/logic/Logic.gf
Normal file
82
grammars/logic/Logic.gf
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
-- many-sorted predicate calculus
|
||||
-- AR 1999, revised 2001
|
||||
|
||||
abstract Logic = {
|
||||
|
||||
flags startcat=Prop ; -- this is what you want to parse
|
||||
|
||||
cat
|
||||
Prop ; -- proposition
|
||||
Dom ; -- domain of quantification
|
||||
Elem Dom ; -- individual element of a domain
|
||||
Proof Prop ; -- proof of a proposition
|
||||
Text ; -- theorem with proof etc.
|
||||
|
||||
fun
|
||||
-- texts
|
||||
Statement : Prop -> Text ;
|
||||
ThmWithProof : (A : Prop) -> Proof A -> Text ;
|
||||
ThmWithTrivialProof : (A : Prop) -> Proof A -> Text ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- logically complex propositions
|
||||
Disj : (A,B : Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
Conj : (A,B : Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
Impl : (A,B : Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
Abs : Prop ;
|
||||
Neg : Prop -> Prop ;
|
||||
|
||||
Univ : (A : Dom) -> (Elem A -> Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
Exist : (A : Dom) -> (Elem A -> Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- progressive implication ŕ la type theory
|
||||
ImplP : (A : Prop) -> (Proof A -> Prop) -> Prop ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- inference rules
|
||||
ConjI : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof A -> Proof B -> Proof (Conj A B) ;
|
||||
ConjEl : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof (Conj A B) -> Proof A ;
|
||||
ConjEr : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof (Conj A B) -> Proof B ;
|
||||
DisjIl : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof A -> Proof (Disj A B) ;
|
||||
DisjIr : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof B -> Proof (Disj A B) ;
|
||||
DisjE : (A,B,C : Prop) -> Proof (Disj A B) ->
|
||||
(Proof A -> Proof C) -> (Proof B -> Proof C) -> Proof C ;
|
||||
ImplI : (A,B : Prop) -> (Proof A -> Proof B) -> Proof (Impl A B) ;
|
||||
ImplE : (A,B : Prop) -> Proof (Impl A B) -> Proof A -> Proof B ;
|
||||
NegI : (A : Prop) -> (Proof A -> Proof Abs) -> Proof (Neg A) ;
|
||||
NegE : (A : Prop) -> Proof (Neg A) -> Proof A -> Proof Abs ;
|
||||
AbsE : (C : Prop) -> Proof Abs -> Proof C ;
|
||||
|
||||
UnivI : (A : Dom) -> (B : Elem A -> Prop) ->
|
||||
((x : Elem A) -> Proof (B x)) -> Proof (Univ A B) ;
|
||||
UnivE : (A : Dom) -> (B : Elem A -> Prop) ->
|
||||
Proof (Univ A B) -> (a : Elem A) -> Proof (B a) ;
|
||||
ExistI : (A : Dom) -> (B : Elem A -> Prop) ->
|
||||
(a : Elem A) -> Proof (B a) -> Proof (Exist A B) ;
|
||||
ExistE : (A : Dom) -> (B : Elem A -> Prop) -> (C : Prop) ->
|
||||
Proof (Exist A B) -> ((x : Elem A) -> Proof (B x) -> Proof C) ->
|
||||
Proof C ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- use a hypothesis
|
||||
Hypo : (A : Prop) -> Proof A -> Proof A ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- pronoun
|
||||
Pron : (A : Dom) -> Elem A -> Elem A ;
|
||||
|
||||
data
|
||||
Proof = ConjI | DisjIl | DisjIr ;
|
||||
|
||||
def
|
||||
-- proof normalization
|
||||
ConjEl _ _ (ConjI _ _ a _) = a ;
|
||||
ConjEr _ _ (ConjI _ _ _ b) = b ;
|
||||
DisjE _ _ _ (DisjIl _ _ a) d _ = d a ;
|
||||
DisjE _ _ _ (DisjIr _ _ b) _ e = e b ;
|
||||
ImplE _ _ (ImplI _ _ b) a = b a ;
|
||||
NegE _ (NegI _ b) a = b a ;
|
||||
UnivE _ _ (UnivI _ _ b) a = b a ;
|
||||
ExistE _ _ _ (ExistI _ _ a b) d = d a b ;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Hypo and Pron are identities
|
||||
Hypo _ a = a ;
|
||||
Pron _ a = a ;
|
||||
|
||||
} ;
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user