From ee213edb8849a985b61f4ef735ce06e6a01aad70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: aarne Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:10:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2 typos --- examples/gfcc/complin.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/gfcc/complin.tex b/examples/gfcc/complin.tex index 30b4908ef..324c97e11 100644 --- a/examples/gfcc/complin.tex +++ b/examples/gfcc/complin.tex @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ constituents. The linearization of such a constituent is compositionally defined to be the record linearizing the body extended with fields for each of the variable symbols: \[ -\sugmap{\lambda x_{0} \rarrow \cdots \rarrow \lambda x_{n} \rarrow b} +\sugmap{(\lambda x_{0} \rarrow \cdots \rarrow \lambda x_{n} \rarrow b)} \;=\; \sugmap{b} *\!* \{\$_{0} = \sugmap{x_{0}} ; \ldots ; \$_{n} = \sugmap{x_{n}}\} \] @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ in Appendix C, we do not treat symbol tables in linearization, but instead generated code in \empha{Symbolic JVM}---that is, JVM with symbolic addresses. Therefore we need a postprocessor that resolves the symbolic addresses, -shown in Appendix D. +shown in Appendix E. To make the postprocessor straightforward, Symbolic JVM has special \texttt{alloc} instructions,