msyds/gf-rgl
1
0
Fork 0
forked from GitHub/gf-rgl
Code Pull Requests Activity

(Ara) Remove prodrop from PredVP; better to have it optional

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Inari Listenmaa
2018-09-21 15:44:31 +02:00
parent fbf8ff0044
commit e6107dcbfb
1 changed files with 12 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
src/arabic/SentenceAra.gf
View File

@@ -58,14 +58,20 @@ concrete SentenceAra of Sentence = CatAra ** open
} in
case o of {
Verbal =>
case <False, np.a.isPron> of {
---- AR workaround 18/12/2008 case <vp.obj.a.isPron, np.a.isPron> of {
--case <False, np.a.isPron> of { ---- AR workaround 18/12/2008
case <vp.obj.a.isPron, np.a.isPron> of {
{- IL: I don't think we should do prodrop here. vStr drops the copula in present tense,
so there's hardly anything left for a predicative clause: e.g.
PredVP (UsePron i_Pron) (UseComp (CompCN (UseN car_N))) "I am a car"
would be linearised just as "car", if we have both prodrop and copula drop.
Leaving it up to someone who knows Arabic to decide what is better.
Original here:
<True,True> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p) ;
-- ya2kuluhu
<False,True> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p);
<False,True> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p); -}
-- ya2kuluhu al-waladu, yakuluhu al-2awlaadu
<False,False> => (vStr t p) ++ np.s ! Nom ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p);
<True,False> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ np.s ! Nom ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p);
<True,True> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p)
<False> => (vStr t p) ++ np.s ! Nom ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p);
<True> => (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ np.s ! Nom ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p)
};
Nominal =>
np.s ! Nom ++ (vStr t p) ++ vp.obj.s ++ vp.s2 ++ (pred t p)