forked from GitHub/gf-core
intro to gf-formalism
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,6 +17,40 @@ Last update: %%date(%c)
|
||||
//formalisms such as CG, ACG, HPSG, and LFG.//
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#NEW
|
||||
|
||||
==Logical Frameworks and Grammar Formalisms==
|
||||
|
||||
Logic - formalization of mathematics (mathematical language?)
|
||||
|
||||
Linguistics - formalization of natural language
|
||||
|
||||
Since math lang is a subset, we can expect similarities.
|
||||
|
||||
But in natural language we have
|
||||
- masses of empirical data
|
||||
- no right of reform
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#NEW
|
||||
|
||||
==High-level programming==
|
||||
|
||||
We have to write a lot of program code when formalizing language.
|
||||
|
||||
We need a language with proper abstractions.
|
||||
|
||||
Cf. Paul Graham on Prolog: very high-level, but wrong abstractions.
|
||||
|
||||
Typed functional languages work well in maths.
|
||||
|
||||
We have developed one for linguistics
|
||||
- some extra constructs, e.g. inflection tables
|
||||
- constraint of reversibility (nontrivial math problem)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#NEW
|
||||
|
||||
==GF in a few words==
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user